Monitoring Policy Making at the United Nations |
| ||||||||||||
General Analysis on Globalization of Politics
These articles discuss the theory, function, and creation of global politics and movements. The page pays special attention to political tools and methods to build understanding about what drives policy making and political movements at an international level.
Also See GPF's Pages on:
Globalization of Politics
Articles and Documents
2008 | 2007 |2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1995
A Question of Political Will (August 2005)
This briefing paper analyzes the report “Mobilising Political Will,” published by the Finnish government in the context of the “Helsinki Process on Globalisation and Democracy” conference. The Helsinki Process tries to bring more democracy into the global governance system, through a "multi-stakeholder approach," involving not only governments but also NGOs and business representatives. While participants generally expressed support for the multi-stakeholder approach, some NGO representatives hinted that sharp differences of opinion among the participants led to "too timid" suggestions on privatization, debt relief and international taxes. (Global Policy Forum and Friedrich Ebert Foundation)
This article, published by the Third World Network, examines the meaning of an "international community" arguing that it is a concept whose primary purpose lies in the imposition of a neoliberal global economic order and the enforcement of conformism among the nations of the world.
2008
The World Turned Upside Down: The Centre Won’t Hold Any More (November 6, 2008)
For two centuries, Western countries have dominated world trade and global politics. Now, the western neoliberal model is in crisis and emerging countries in East and South Asia, and Latin America challenge the world hegemony, making global governance more diversified. For example, after the collapse on Wall Street, the US asked China and Singapore for financial help.(Le Monde diplomatique)The Myth of the Nation-State (September 2, 2008)
Transnational challenges such as pollution, terrorism and climate change undermine nation-states’ status as principal actors in international relations. But, argues this article, many university professors still base their curricula on the “myth of the nation-state.” By focusing on the nation-state, they not only overlook global solutions, they further assume that the nation-state is a coherent and homogenous entity. The author calls for a stronger role for non-state actors, human rights, and ethics in the study of international relations. (Policy Innovations)A Third Way: Globalization from the Bottom (August 6, 2008)
In his book, “How to Rule the World: the Coming Battle Over the Global Economy,” Mark Engler argues that, “imperial globalization,” driven by the US’s growing international influence and “corporate globalization,” which promotes the interests of transnational companies, reinforce poverty and income inequality. Instead, Engler advocates “democratic globalization,” which he defines as a bottom-up movement addressing the problems of an increasingly connected world. Engler cites the World Social Forum as an example of this approach, which provides the opportunity for people from around the world to tackle topics such as environmental degradation. (Foreign Policy In Focus)David Grewal on Network Power (May 31, 2008)
In this interview, David Grewal explores the moral implications of globalization that creates networks of global elites who make decisions on global policies behind closed doors and impose them on others. For example, in 1998 OECD countries proposed a Multilateral Agreement on Investment to allow corporations to carry out financial operations all over the world, without regard for national laws and citizens’ rights. Grewal says that international treaties “should emerge from global consultation and not as the product of a closed-door deliberation by rich countries.” (Policy Innovations)Runaway Globalization Without Governance (May 2008)
This YaleGlobal article says globalization has created a borderless world that needs a system of global governance. World leaders should address nuclear nonproliferation and climate change through global rules. But, multilateral agreements require nations to compromise national sovereignty and global rules do not always fulfill each country’s economic and security interests. The US has the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons and has not ratified the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. The author says that the US’s “exceptionalist credo [puts] the world that globalization has created at considerable risk.”
2007
Globalization, the State and the Democratic Deficit (July 18, 2007)
UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown is proposing a set of reforms that will increase the powers of the legislative branch of government, including giving parliament a bigger role in international policy making. This openDemocracy article argues that such reforms would address the “democratic deficit” created by globalization in the last couple of decades. While much globalization literature claims that globalization has weakened the state, the author argues that it has weakened the legislature, but strengthened the executive. For example, major international institutions such as the IMF and the WTO negotiate exclusively with the executive power, leaving global economic policy unscrutinized by parliaments.Two Economic Giants, How Many Votes? (April 3, 2007)
Although the US currently dominates the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization, the rapid expansion of the Chinese economy may soon threaten US economic hegemony. China’s increasing voting shares in all three institutions could allow it to shift the global balance of power and “drive international economic policy the way no nation has before.” (International Herald Tribune)Globalization and Child Labor: The Cause Can Also Be A Cure (March 13, 2007)
This YaleGlobal article reports that, while economic globalization has brought about forced child labor, political globalization can “put an end to the practice” through public opinion. The 2001 Cocoa Protocol, for example, which promoted a label certifying chocolate products as “child labor free,” arose out of global public outcry over the human rights violations in the cacao industry. However, the author argues that only a broad, unified approach by policymakers, companies, and civil society can successfully end the exploitation of child labor.Democracy in the Light of Globalization (February 19, 2007)
Global democracy might be the only way to prevent world war, argues this World Economy and Development article. The author details growing discontent with US unilateralism, the decline of the US’s economic dominance, and the rising role of developing countries in multilateral institutions as “windows of opportunity” for the formation of this more peaceful and equitable global society.Chairman’s Summary: Shadow G-8 (February 9, 2007)
Joseph Stiglitz summarizes a discussion on “global growth with responsibility” by “a diverse group of concerned citizens from around the world,” including leading economists and former government officials. The resulting consensus calls for a reformed G8 process which would enable participation from all countries “to discuss informally the major issues facing the world,” with a focus on the four immediate problems of climate change, global imbalances, global governance, and poverty, especially in Africa. (Initiative for Policy Dialogue)
2006
The Globalization Index 2006 (November-December 2006)
In this sixth annual Globalization Index report Foreign Policy and A.T. Kearney rank 62 countries, accounting for 85 percent of the world’s population, according to their degree of globalization as measured by 12 variables. The variables fall in the four categories of economic integration, personal contact, technological connectivity, and political engagement, revealing also “the very different ways that countries are opening themselves up.” Throughout the report, the authors imply that more globalization is always better. However, despite this clearly positive and seemingly uncritical view of globalization, the report acknowledges that “highly globalized nations spew more carbon dioxide per capita than less globalized countries.”At the UN, How We Envy the World Cup (June 9, 2006)
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan describes the World Cup as a model for successful international politics. Annan points out four manners in which the international community could learn from the World Cup: accountability, conversation and analysis, equality, and willingness to learn from other countries. Individuals throughout the world dissect World Cup interactions with an enthusiasm and critical analysis often missing in political discussions. (International Herald Tribune)Preface to “Global Poverty or Global Justice?” (June 2006)
Looking at structures of power and inequality in the world, this preface discusses obstacles to and prospects for achieving global justice. The lack of international democratic processes and institutions greatly impedes global justice, but it conveniently suits the interests of the “present masters of mankind.” However, the author argues, great promise lies with the “global justice movement.” The author finds encouragement in tendencies such as a growing realization worldwide of neoliberalism’s injustices, the increasing ease with which global justice alliances can form, and mounting support for global taxation as a source of funding for development projects. (Transnational Institute)Development through Globalization? (March 2006)
As globalization has diminished many of the policy options available to poor countries, the United Nations University World Institute for Development and Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) urges governments to rethink their global development strategies. In order to achieve development that improves the quality of life, politicians need to reshape international regulations to balance social progress with economic growth. This “new consensus on development” would eventually help poor countries to make their own political choices while having a say in international decision-making.Unbridled Capitalism Will Lead to Very Real Problems (April 17, 2006)
In this interview, Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff warns that the unfair distribution of wealth within most countries will lead to serious social tensions all over the world. As big company profits reach record highs, an ever-smaller percentage of the population gains from high economic growth rates, while most workers see their wages stagnate. As a result, governments could lose public support for policies promoting deregulation of market activities. (Spiegel)Could Globalization Fail? (April 13, 2006)
As happened with the “first globalization” and its Wall Street Crash of 1929, an economic rather than a political crisis could reverse today's process of globalization. But this time, the crisis is more likely to errupt from global economy’s dependence on transnational corporations (TNCs) than from global financial imbalances. While relying highly on the middle-class consuming their goods, TNCs at the same time undermine middle-class people’s ability to consume by moving ever more “white-collar” jobs to poorer countries. (Yale Global)Globalization's Deficit (January 9, 2006)
This article argues that multilateral policy making has run out of “forward momentum.” Compared to the last decades of the 20th century, many countries are less eager to concede power to international economic and political institutions. But, this article warns, national policy making cannot sufficiently respond to problems that have global repercussions such as international financial crises and global warming. (Washington Post)
2005
The Mother of All Coalitions (November 29, 2005)
Some researchers argue that while civil society is becoming increasingly global, states remain locked within their borders. The UN reflects the power imbalance between powerful and weak nations, and lacks effective political power. The Organisation for Promoting Global Civilisation proposes to create a World Coalition Parliament, which would hold legislative power, and a World Coalition Government, which would be an executive body. Based on the EU model, this body would replace the UN in addressing global challenges such as poverty, hunger and conflicts. (Inter Press Service)Making Globalization Work (February 28, 2005)
Turning a blind eye to asymmetries of economic globalization, this Washington Post op-ed piece says the wave of trade liberalization has benefited the world’s poor. But the article also draws attention to the fact that political globalization has not kept pace with economic development, and encourages governments to tackle the issue by strengthening global institutions.
2004
Environmentalists Push a New Lever: Globalization (July 6, 2004)
Environmentalists, frustrated by inactivity in US policy, are turning their efforts toward policy making in the EU, "hoping to use regulations there as a lever for regulations in the United States." US corporations are forced to comply with these laws when they are exporting or working abroad. Additionally, such legislation sets international precedent and supports domestic lobbyists' progressive propositions. (International Herald Tribune)
2003
An Indigenous World. How Native Peoples Can Turn Globalization to Their Advantage (November/December, 2003)
Globalization of activism has brought indigenous peoples “powerful allies, a louder voice that can be heard internationally, and increased political influence at home.” While acting as a cultural homogenizer, globalization may paradoxically also empower “the poor, the different and the local.” (Foreign Policy)Should Africa Follow EU Model? (September 24, 2003)
Africa needs unity in politics to achieve stability; yet this article argues Africa should not pursue the bureaucratic European model. Instead, the African Union could ensure higher public participation by broad education and information on the benefits and dangers of integration. (Bangkok Post)The Rise of Netpolitik: How the Internet Is Changing International Politics and Diplomacy (2003)
The Aspen Institute roundtable report credits the internet as a powerful force in modern world politics. The internet empowers and increases the visibility of NGOs, individuals, and many other actors. It changes the existing power structure by offering more people a means to influence others. Also, it creates a global forum where people can communicate and network without the constraints of geographical distance and national borders.
2002
'One World': The Moral and Practical Challenges of Globalization (December 1, 2002)
In his new book, Princeton University professor Peter Singer states, “How well we come through the era of globalization… will depend on how we respond ethically to the idea that we live in one world.'' Among other issues, he argues for increased action to combat poverty and for more effective global governance to enforce environmental and labor laws. (New York Times)The Walls Have to Come Down (October 4, 2002)
In a speech to the Yale University Center for the Study of Globalization, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan addresses the urgent need for “the globalization of community”. (International Herald Tribune)EU Emphasizes World Summit Role (January 30, 2002)
According to the European Union, international political institutions have failed to match the rapid progress of economic globalization. The approaching World Summit on Sustainable Development provides an opportunity to catch-up. (Business Day, Johannesburg)
2001
High Noon for the Global Economy (March 9, 2001)
Old News: Governments lag behind the pace of globalization. New News: It is utopian to think government can recapture a role that is meant to embody the human purpose.Bridging the Globalization Gap: Toward Global Parliament (January-February 2001)
It is a fact that there is a need to democratize the international system. However, this article from Foreign Affairs is a mind game on how to go about it.
2000
Governing Globalism (May 3, 2000)
A foreword from the Atlantic Monthly of a new book on globalization written by Anthony Giddens, Director of the London School of Economics.
1999
Globalization Needs a Dose of Democracy (October 5, 1999)
An article from International Herald Tribune contributed by Richard Falk and Andrew Strauss emphasizing democratization considering the increasingly important global dimensions of politics.
1995
Sustainability and Democracy (October 1995)
A conference sponsored by IBASE and WEED, Bonn, October, 1995. Two very original papers question the concept of "sustainability" and propose new understandings.
More Information on Globalization
